<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>notsocommoncents &#187; Vertical Integration</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.notsocommoncents.com/tag/vertical-integration/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.notsocommoncents.com</link>
	<description>Shouldn't business make sense?</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 23 Apr 2010 12:40:24 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>Apple&#8217;s shift into chip design</title>
		<link>http://www.notsocommoncents.com/2009/04/apples-shift-into-chip-design/</link>
		<comments>http://www.notsocommoncents.com/2009/04/apples-shift-into-chip-design/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 01 May 2009 01:27:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Justin McDowell</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[In the news]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Apple]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Strategy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Vertical Integration]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.notsocommoncents.com/?p=46</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The Wall Street Journal is reporting on Apple&#8217;s efforts to assemble the people and intellectual property pieces into a strategy to exploit opportunities for exclusive features and to take back control over its product release cycle.
While I can understand and appreciate Apple&#8217;s desire to limit 3rd party involvement around new and updated products, what interests [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.notsocommoncents.com/2009/04/apples-shift-into-chip-design/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>4</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
